Navigating the Bendel Case: What It Means for Your Trust Structure

The High Court’s landmark decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel represents a major shift for families and business owners utilising trusts and corporate beneficiaries. For years, the prevailing assumption was that leaving an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) outstanding would automatically trigger tax complications under Division 7A. However, the High Court has turned that assumption on its head by ruling that a UPE from a trust to a corporate beneficiary is not automatically treated as a loan.

A Closer Look at the Ruling

The core issue centred on a straightforward question: if a trust assigns a UPE to a corporate beneficiary but delays payment, does that delay constitute a loan?

The High Court concluded that it does not automatically qualify as one. By carefully analysing the specific trust deed and how the distributions were formally recorded, the Court found that the UPE was strictly held for the corporate beneficiary rather than functioning as a repayable loan. This pivotal ruling directly challenges the ATO’s long-held interpretation.

Why Nuance Still Matters

While this is undoubtedly encouraging news, it is not a green light to assume all trust arrangements involving corporate beneficiaries are suddenly risk-free. Every arrangement must still be evaluated on its individual merits.

Ultimate tax safety remains heavily dependent on the exact wording of your trust deed, year-end trustee resolutions, and financial accounting methods. Furthermore, the ATO is actively reviewing its official guidance following the decision, meaning tax professionals must keep a close watch on this space. The broader integrity frameworks governing trust distributions and private companies remain fully active, and the ATO will likely scrutinise alternative provisions within the Tax Act regarding these exact structures.

Your Action Plan Moving Forward

  • Consult your advisor immediately: Reach out to your advisor to evaluate how the Bendel case specifically impacts your unique structure. They will conduct a comprehensive review of your outstanding UPEs, the specific tax years and financial figures involved, existing Division 7A strategies, trust deeds, trustee resolutions, and financial statement disclosures.
  • Exercise patience: We must wait for the ATO’s formal, updated response. This upcoming guidance will be essential in defining how both new and existing UPE arrangements with corporate beneficiaries will be treated going forward.
  • Prepare for upcoming budget changes: It is crucial to anticipate how future federal budget measures will affect trust distributions. Starting 1 July 2028, a minimum 30% tax rate will apply to all discretionary trusts, and corporate beneficiaries will lose their entitlement to credits for the tax paid. Consequently, distributing trust income to corporate beneficiaries will likely become unviable from that date onward.

The Takeaway

Ultimately, Bendel delivers highly favourable news for many taxpayers, but it is not a blank cheque to ignore your current UPE strategies. The ATO’s upcoming stance will dictate the definitive next steps for compliance and structuring.

If you want to proactively review your trust structure or gain complete clarity on what Bendel means for your business, contact your local Accru advisor today.

About the Author
Martin Rush, Accru Perth
Martin’s hands-on approach to understanding his clients’ needs enables him to find the best possible solutions for them. His approach builds trust and has enabled him to forge many long-term relationships over his 20-year career. Martin Rush joined Accru Page Kirk & Jennings in 1993 after completing his Bachelor of Business degree.
Start Your Journey
Building a successful company? Want to take your business international? Manage your cashflow better? Buying property? Or do you need an audit?
Find an ACCRU office near you
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.